leadslooki.blogg.se

Qupzilla ram
Qupzilla ram








qupzilla ram

But I doubt it's more light-weight than Chrome/Chromium. Xxxterm could be a nice one too (and it runs javascript) but I didn't test the recent versions.Įpiphany was already behaving much better last time I tried and it seems it received a good improvement (which I didn't try neither and possibly is available only in Debian sid). Then there are other truly light-weight but with less features. But it does use more memory (I don't know if it uses just because it's available.). Qupzilla is stable and lightweight (the development version has already many improvements over the latest release) but Chrome uses the same amount of RAM so.įirefox is great (maybe the best all around, IMO - I use Chrome but I keep Firefox around just in case - Chrome is also excellent but then Google sometimes feels a bit pushy). I suspect why, but it isn't the case to discuss that. Midori has some nice (IMO) design features but the development versions lately are unusable (and I also read that 4.3 isn't much better).

#Qupzilla ram full#

Honestly, a full featured lightweight browser is Chrome/Chromium.

qupzilla ram

How come you vote based on what you read? I vote for Midori as lightweight option based upon what i read.įavorite i am not sure - but assume Firefox - but i read that SeaMoneky could be a better option, still not test it yet.










Qupzilla ram